Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 1281 - 1300 of 16,385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Amusingly, there is a split between Trump and his enablers, with everyone but Trump wishing that he would become “disciplined” and talk about his supposed strong suit. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:59 am by christopher
The publishing and academic worlds are watching the clock tick down to the perhaps historic decision of federal judge Orinda Evans in Cambridge University Press et al v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 3:09 pm by anbrandon
It reversed and remanded to the district court.Lobbins v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Next, Hungary argued that the United States does not have a strong enough interest in the case to warrant hearing the case without the plaintiffs first seeking a remedy in Hungarian courts. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:14 pm
  Of course, proponents of gun control can make strong policy arguments that states and localities should be allowed to make their own distinct gun regulation choices, but are there any really good legal arguments that states and localities should not be subject to the same Second Amendment rules that limit the federal government? [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:59 am by Amy Howe
The post Wedding cakes v. religious beliefs? [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am by ASAD KHAN
” (iv) Financial Independence and s 117B(3) Characterising Ms Rhuppiah’s case as “a good example of the sometimes flimsy distinction between employment and third party support”, Lord Wilson took the view that “financial independence” in s 117B(3) means an absence of financial dependence upon the state. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
  Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 12:52 pm by William A. Ruskin
  An excellent example of what a joint e-discovery judicial submission might look like may be found in the class action litigation styled United States of America v. [read post]