Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 3,716
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
The appointing authority, however, sustained all charges filed against the individual and terminated the individual's employment.In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:07 am
Defendant wins the appeal.Defendant wins because settled Supreme Court authority, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 7:22 am
The case is being litigated at the trial level by James Sullivan, Esq., of New York City. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:16 am
As the story describes the decision in Grant v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
The appointing authority, however, sustained all charges filed against the individual and terminated the individual's employment.In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
That's the rule in Darnell v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
The appointing authority, however, sustained all charges filed against the individual and terminated the individual's employment.In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:20 am
That's the rule in Anderson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
This is a very nuanced holding.The case is Barnes v. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 5:53 am
Sullivan" (NYT). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:57 am
The Court of Appeals' leading case on this issue is Graham v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:50 am
" That's the rule in Ashcroft v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 3:32 pm
Sullivan emerged against the backdrop of intense racial strife. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 6:24 am
That's the rule in Blessing v. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 6:48 am
The answer is yes.The case is Sutton v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 4:00 am
Smith and Washington v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 12:16 am
Sullivan LJ (an experienced planning judge) disagreed. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 2:09 pm
The argument in Danforth v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
I recently received this memo from our friends at Sullivan & Cromwell discussing the proposals. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 5:41 pm
City of Mesquite, 129 F.3d 831, 832-33 (5th Cir.1997); Sullivan v. [read post]