Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 4,350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2024, 5:13 am
We will await the decisions in the parallel EPO proceedings in order to compare their approaches to patent validity.CopyrightKatfriend Caroline Theunis reflected on the copyright dispute behind Taylor Swift's decision to re-record her earlier albums after becoming dissatisfied with the way the record label was using its economic rights. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in McCord v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:31 pm
In State of Tennessee v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:51 am
Sunstein, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:00 am
”** Law enforcement personnel including correction officers are public officers subject to the provisions of Public Officers Law §30(1)(e) [see Graham v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 1014].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03535.htm [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:12 am
[W]hile Patent Owner’s argument that the United States 'directed and controlled the allegedly infringing activity' is not without relevance, it does not bear directly on the categories identified by the Supreme Court in [Taylor v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 7:00 am
On July 1st, Roger V. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 12:42 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 11:14 am
Margaret Taylor summarized the oral arguments from Trump v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:00 am
”** Law enforcement personnel including correction officers are public officers subject to the provisions of Public Officers Law §30(1)(e) [see Graham v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 1014].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03535.htm [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 2:44 am
"]Vineyard 29, LLC v. 29 Wine Company, LLC, Opposition No. 91227774 (October 29, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jyll Taylor) [Opposition to registration of HIGHWAY 29 for wine in view of the registered mark 29 for wine. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 7:11 am
Fulks v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 5:02 am
US v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:51 pm
Enter the recent decision out of Kitchener of Wiles v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:34 am
Access Copyright and the SOCAN v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:19 am
PBA v Suffolk, Sup. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:18 am
Some Related Posts: * Section 230 Preempts Unfair Competition Law Claim–Taylor v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 1:00 am
” (paragraph 31) The Supreme Court pointed to authority, Taylor v General Medical Council [1990] 2 AC 539, which was “unfortunately not cited” to the Extra Division. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:41 am
The employment status of religious workers of all faiths has been a recurring problem in the courts: see, for example, Percy v Church of Scotland Board of National Mission [2005] UKHL 73 and Methodist Conference v Preston [2013] UKSC 29. [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:39 am
Nick Taylor (NFP) - "Nick Taylor ("Taylor") filed a complaint in Marion Superior Court against Theatre on the Square ("the Theatre"). [read post]
