Search for: "Tenant 1" Results 1281 - 1300 of 6,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2017, 12:44 am by Tessa Shepperson
If anyone wants to check all this the rules are set out in Schedule 1 of the act. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:18 am by Giles Peaker
The issue was whether a section 8 notice on rent arrears grounds, in this instance grounds 8, 10 and 11, is a ‘demand for rent’ for the purposes of section 47 Landlord and Tenant Act 1987: 47 Landlord’s name and address to be contained in demands for rent etc. (1) Where any written demand is given to a tenant of premises to which this Part applies, the demand must contain the following information, namely— (a) the name and address of the landlord,… [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:51 pm
The punitives were knocked down to $1 million, although Thomas was also looking at several hundred thousand dollars in attorneys fees. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:51 pm by Mary Clapp
Tenants often find, however, that their CAM charges are more expensive than anticipated. [read post]
24 May 2019, 12:32 am by Tessa Shepperson
The tenant of a £1 million Hampstead flat, Carlos Reguero Perez, had an accident when the security gates to his property became operational and he was unable to get in as the agents Savills had not given him a key. [read post]
4 Dec 2012, 1:19 pm by NL
[…](2A) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply in a case where— (a) the deposit has been returned to the tenant in full or with such deductions as are agreed between the landlord and tenant, or (b) an application to a county court has been made under section 214(1) and has been determined by the court, withdrawn or settled by agreement between the parties.The argument being that (2A)(a) means that once the deposit has been returned to the… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:40 am by admin
  Thus, unlike the normal rental relationship where the landlord has leverage and the tenant has mobility, here the tenant has most of the leverage. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
On Monday, June 29, Chief Judge Colleen McMahon, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a 37-page opinion which threw out a lawsuit filed by three landlords who alleged that New York State’s moratorium -- on evicting tenants facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the directive permitting tenants to have their landlords apply their security deposits to any outstanding rent -- was constitutionally… [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
On Monday, June 29, Chief Judge Colleen McMahon, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a 37-page opinion which threw out a lawsuit filed by three landlords who alleged that New York State’s moratorium -- on evicting tenants facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the directive permitting tenants to have their landlords apply their security deposits to any outstanding rent -- was constitutionally… [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:19 am by Giles Peaker
Hickmet and Cheerz Express Limited v Dragos (Luton County Court, 19 January 2024) Ms Dragos was the assured shorthold tenant of Cheerz Express, with the tenancy beginning 1 June 2017. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 6:08 am by Tessa Shepperson
I sent him a further email and iMessage to ask his availability to get 1 remaining repair done, to which he has so far not responded. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 12:04 am by Tessa Shepperson
The basic rule is that landlords can charge whatever they like, and the rent can only be challenged by tenants: During the first six months of the tenancy (assured shorthold tenancies only), and Upon service of a notice to increase rent, which can be used by landlords annually to increase the rent after the fixed term has ended So far as (1) is concerned, if a tenant believes his rent is more than the current market rent for his property, he can refer the rent to the… [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 10:18 pm
The Defendant pleaded the whole arrangment being the act of “a poor and ignorant man”, (Creswell v Potter (1968) [1978] 1 WLR 255, Backhouse v Backhouse [1978] 1 WLR 243). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by Giles Peaker
Note that this encompasses both Category 1 and Category 2 hazards. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
., issued on February 10.What occasions this infrequent procedure is a ruling the three-judge panel issued in December 2019, found at 944 F.3d 370 (2d Cir. 2019), in which the Court held by a 2 to 1 majority that the Fair Housing Act holds landlords liable if they to stop known racial harassment in their buildings. [read post]