Search for: "Three S Consulting v. US" Results 1281 - 1300 of 5,356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2020, 9:32 am by Mark Tabakman
  Then, a lawsuit ensues and the employer may want to use the defense that it relied in good faith on its attorney’s advice. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:21 am by Eric Goldman
A few standout points in the multi-factor test: regarding mark similarity, the court accepts the plaintiff’s allegation that “Defendant uses terms similar to Plaintiffs’ registered trademarks and uses the identical marks as keywords to manipulate search engine results and confuse consumers, including using Alder’s marks in the ads themselves. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 7:36 am
There are several Hialeah political consultants who saw that and said "Conjo! [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 9:48 am by Eric Goldman
This is underlined by the words “tick tock” and use of the “clock face three o’clock” emoji, which infer that the plaintiff’s time (in terms of being dealt with for her wrongdoing) was up. 46. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Briefly: In an article published by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, SCOTUSblog Books Editor Ronald Collins examines the Supreme Court’s recent decision on robocalls in Barr v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 7:26 am by Mansell Law
However, until the Ohio Supreme Court’s recent decision in Buddenberg v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 11:51 am by ADR Times
In Sutherland’s “Statutory Construction” (3rd Edn., Vol. 2) and Crawford’s “Construction of Statutes” (1940 Edn.) it is postulated that:“Where the statute’s meaning is clear and explicit, words cannot be interpolated. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 11:02 am by ADR Times
In Sutherland’s “Statutory Construction” (3rd Edn., Vol. 2) and Crawford’s “Construction of Statutes” (1940 Edn.) it is postulated that:“Where the statute’s meaning is clear and explicit, words cannot be interpolated. [read post]