Search for: "US v. Anderson" Results 1281 - 1300 of 2,418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2014, 4:42 am by Amy Howe
” At Business Insider, Erin Fuchs previews next month’s argument in Holt v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:38 am
 "Disclosing business secrets to share purchasers" is an IP Draughts post by the ever-perceptive Mark Anderson, it being a review of the recent ruling in Richmond Pharmacology Limited v Chester Overseas Limited and others [2014] EWHC 2692 (Ch) noted by the IPKat here. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 6:45 am
“Apart from this information, it is too early for us to talk about our opening, but [we] look forward to giving more information closer to the opening,” Anderson added.Consensus from retail analysts is that Atterbury Property’s R3.5 billion shopping centre development north of Sandton, called Mall of Africa, will be home to H&M.The area has been a prime node for mixed use development, making a strong case for the retailer to choose Waterfall City,… [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:55 am
The building’s roof is covered with solar panels and rain harvesting system, catapulting the building to its green credentials.The other two in this category are Cape Town’s No. 1 Silo at the V&A Waterfront and Midrand’s Vodafone site solution innovation centre.Cape Town’s office development No.1 V&A Waterfront has been rated under the prestigious six star green rating.The 18 723 square metre commercial office space No. 1 Silo achieved the rating for… [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 4:58 am by Woodrow Pollack
 Case administratively closed and parties obligated to file a status report every 90 days.The Andersons, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:27 am
To that end, thanks to Ken Anderson and the Volokh Conspiracy for this invitation to follow up on some key questions about proportionality in armed conflict. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 3:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Delaware Supreme Court stirred up quite a bit of controversy earlier this year in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:16 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee’s retaliation claim failed because no reasonable jury could find her harassment complaint, which was made during an investigation into the conduct for which she was fired, was the “but for” reason for her discharge (Shaeffer v Anderson Management Co, Inc, July 9, 2014, Gale, K). [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 7:17 am by Patricia Salkin
Anderson v City of Blue Ash, 2014 WL 3102326 (SD OH 7/7/2014)Filed under: Agricultural Uses, Current Caselaw, Discrimination [read post]