Search for: "US v. Banks" Results 1281 - 1300 of 12,578
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2013, 12:45 pm
  In the future, he can put the money in the bank instead of up his nose. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:10 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Held: where the parties have used unambiguous language, the court must apply it. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 5:25 am
While certainly not a sterling outcome for Biaggi, the matter will now proceed to trial on the issue of damages.For a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: Sterling National Bank v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:07 am by Vassilis Mavrakis
In a late 2020 judgment (Aegean Baltic Bank SA v Renzlor Shipping Ltd and Ors [2020] EWHC 2851 (Comm)), the High Court provided important guidance on the position of a bank under security documents relating to a loan agreement, and its obligations when exercising its rights as assignee to the insurance policies over a vessel. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 pm by John Wright
One argument the banks were using (and sometimes winning) was the theory that SFR ’s decision did not apply to foreclosures that occurred before date of that decision. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:16 am
It went on to decline to rule One West's arguments that Benafel did in fact use the property as her principal residence, saying the bank is free to make that argument on remand. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:56 pm by Dharmendra Chatur
The UK Supreme Court on Nov. 2, 2011 handed down two interesting judgments: Rainy Sky S.A and others (Appellants) v Kookmin Bank (Respondent) [ see judgment, press summary, BAILII] The Court held that when there is an ambiguity in construction of a clause in a commercial contract, the interpretation that would be consistent with business common sense should be given effect to. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:22 am
  Someone who is convicted of a bank robbery can face up to 20 years in prison, even without using a weapon or threatening a teller in any way. [read post]