Search for: "US v. Bridges"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 2,473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
Supreme Court (in Clark v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
It seems useful, then, as a first matter, to consider carefully the structures of those differences. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Bridges, who explained the US situation when it comes to trademark and copyright overlapping.* When Trademarks Overlap With Other IP Rights: conference report 3In the panel discussion that followed, Michael Ritscher (Meyerlustenberger Lachenal), Max Kinkelday (Gruneker), and Andrew Bridges keep debating of overlap between trade marks and copyright. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:52 am
It’s with us right here. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
Market survey evidence is controversial but still used in trade mark law, but has little applicability to copyright. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:32 am
Bridges, addressing the US position -- not so much in terms of how they overlap but in terms of those elements of which that don't overlap, which is really important when seeking to estimate the significance of overlap. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:00 pm
The merger agreement also required HIG to make a $12 million bridge loan to Comverge, and the associated notes were convertible into 8,571,428 shares of Comverge common stock at $1.40 per share. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:00 pm
The short answer is yes--but it depends.In DW Aina Le‘a Development, LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:00 pm
The short answer is yes--but it depends.In DW Aina Le‘a Development, LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 6:32 pm
County of Kaua'i Planning Commision (Memorandum Opinion); Bridge Aina Lea, LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 3:56 pm
He will discuss major disputes on which the Tribunal has adjudicated, including BPI v MCPS [Blogger's note - a superb judgement from Robin Jacob QC, as he then was] and Meltwater v NLA. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 11:54 pm
If this story is interesting or, perhaps, concerning to you, you should follow the case pending before the US Supreme Court entitled North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
” Tell us why you selected that quote. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:55 am
Estate of Barbara Bobo v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 9:00 pm
Thursday, November 13th at 10 am: Finally, we remind you that oral arguments in USA v. al Nashiri will resume on Thursday at 10 am in the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:36 am
In today’s case (Langille v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
(I confess this gave me flashbacks to controversies over the use of Norplant.) [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:11 am
The case, City of Chicago v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
” Bridges v. [read post]
