Search for: "United States v. California" Results 1281 - 1300 of 13,831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Bryn Hines
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
After all, "it is our law and our tradition that more speech, not less, is the governing rule," Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:00 am by Derek Chaiken
However, she was not forgiven by the Honorable André Birotte Jr., of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who agreed with Great Lakes Insurance that Mrs. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 10:17 am by Jon L. Gelman
The court granted the request, made under California Rules of Court, Rule 8.548, that the court will decide questions of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:08 am by ernst
This is the biography of an Austrian Jewish immigrant who arrived in the United States at age eleven speaking not a word of English, who by age twenty-six befriended former president Theodore Roosevelt, and who by age fifty was one of Franklin Roosevelt’s most trusted advisers. [read post]
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are no CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. 3. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 8:04 am by Latosha M. Ellis and Rachel E. Hudgins
New to the list of risks facing high education policyholders are the potential implications of the Supreme Court’s recent decisions, including New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:50 pm by McKennon Law Group
The de novo standard of review is the “default” national standard, and it has been since 1989, when the United States Supreme Court held (in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am by NARF
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act) Simmons v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 8:14 am
").SB 260 will also violate the "Dormant Commerce Clause" of the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:47 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Looking to states such as California and New York as models, other states can follow their lead. [read post]