Search for: "United States v. Classic" Results 1281 - 1300 of 1,755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2011, 7:22 am by Glenn
The world of communications has been dominated for three decades, since United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:56 am
United Mexican States, a matter concerning an investment in the State of Sonora, Mexico. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by John Dehn
  He is Commander-in-chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several States when called into the actual service of the United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Kedar
Update: As correctly noted by Mike Sachs, Chief Justice Roberts’ most significant betrayal to date was in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Ruthann Robson - Guest
Lopez),  the Necessary and Proper Clause (United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 pm by Richard A. Epstein
  Each begins with the sensible assumption that the law as stated in Wickard v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm by Eva Arevuo
 This law provides an exception to the general rule that the person who creates a work is the legal author of that work; according to copyright law in the United States, a work “made for hire” is legally owned by the employer, and not the employee. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm by Ken Kersch
In an echo of political scientist Gerald Rosenberg’s classic (and controversial) book, The Hollow Hope: Can the Courts Bring About Social Change (Chicago, 1991), the publisher’s description of The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan states that “The judicial backlash of the 1890s—the most powerful the United States has ever experienced—illustrates vividly the risks of seeking fundamental social change. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:43 am by Drew Boortz
" Well, the answer takes a bit of mental gymnastics, so click through the jump to read on.The judge in Mosley concluded that "Accidjazzed Evening" was a "United States work" by determining: A “United States work” exists if it was first published simultaneously in the US and another country. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Russell Jackson
  The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow:  "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:49 pm by Rick Hasen
I can’t wait to read Joel Gora’s new article in the Georgia State Law Review symposium on Citizens United. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:15 am by Marty Lederman
" This dictum about public "persua[sive]" speech later became the basis for the indictment -- which the district court refused to dismiss on First Amendment grounds -- in United States v. [read post]