Search for: "United States v. Gay" Results 1281 - 1300 of 1,810
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2011, 1:45 pm by brian
The suit asserts that the policy violates adult patrons' rights under the Washington State and United States Constitutions. [read post]
The suit asserts that the policy violates adult patrons' rights under the Washington State and United States Constitutions. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
My duty, rather, is to “decide cases ‘agreeably to the Constitution and laws of the United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am by Melina Padron
Whilst Wagner was of the opinion that it is for Parliament to balance all the different values surrounding gay marriage, Wilson suggests the separation of church and state completely with regard to marriage (akin to the French system) as a solution. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:00 am by Liam Thornton
In a recent United Kingdom Supreme Court decision, HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department the question that arose was whether a person had to be ‘discrete’ in relation to their sexuality so as to avoid persecution by the state. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:05 am by Kent Scheidegger
From north of the border comes a reminder that freedom of speech is broader in the United States than nearly anywhere else, even our English common-law brethren. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 3:04 pm by Bridget Crawford
Reuters reports on the United States Supreme Court’s denial of cert today in Oren Adar v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:38 pm by Rekha Arulanantham, ACLU
Tracked: The Supreme Court Shouldn't Let Technology Trump the Constitution This week we filed a friend-of-the-court brief in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 6:58 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
: "Sorry Joanie, I had to unfollow you" http://j.mp/pQtFS2 "Military Court Rules It's OK for Marine to Wear Uniform in Gay Porn" http://j.mp/pfKnfF this is good to see (but somewhat unexpected): "Military chaplains can perform same-sex marriages" http://j.mp/oS6rVX australia, canada, japan, morocco, new zealand, south korea, singapore & the united states have signed acta http://j.mp/r0dMhB #lwb486 surely he's too busy to… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm by David Lat
This latest stage of the litigation places the constitutional issue front and center.United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am by Melina Padron
Russell KNAGGS and Ramzy KHACHIK v the United Kingdom – 46559/06 [2011] ECHR 1328 (30 August 2011) European Court of Human Rights: refusal to admit intercept evidence in court proceedings not breach of human rights. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:38 am by Ari Ezra Waldman
United States likely did with the legislative repeal of DADT. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:58 pm by nflatow
United States of America, a case that there can be no doubt rushed along the repeal of DADT. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:26 am by John Culhane
He begins his opinion – a landmark for gay rights – with a quote from the infamous 1896 case of Plessy v. [read post]