Search for: "United States v. Harris" Results 1281 - 1300 of 2,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2012, 9:40 am by Matthew Bush
United StatesDocket: 11-955Issue(s): Whether the McCormick v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:04 pm
  The majority concluded, following a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Luckey v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm by Richard Pildes
Harris from North Carolina – further reveal, the court simply is not going to permit states to be casual in invoking the VRA to justify race-based districting. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:51 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Clarke and Molly Saltskog discussed how the United States should react to Beijing and Tehran’s new partnership. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:20 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
No home release or wristlet if mandatory 180 jail.State v Harris 439 NJ Super. 150 (App. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 4:53 am
XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYThe Court answers the question certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
If a state were to pass a law today saying that, say, its governor will decide which slate of electors will represent the state in the Electoral College every four years, that law would not violate the United States Constitution.Now, however, such laws have no prospect of being passed in enough states to guarantee a Republican win in 2024. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm by Peter Margulies
That provision empowers the president to deny entry to foreign nationals when entry would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:48 am
Justice Department drew upon letter from Secretary of State Dean Acheson in its brief in Brown v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am by Brian Shiffrin
  The statute (Section 2711) defines governmental entity as "a department or agency of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof." [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
The Commonwealth further stated that its protocol would not violate [Gelfgatt’s] rights under . . . the 5h Amendment to the United States Constitution. . . . [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]