Search for: "United States v. Morales"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 3,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2017, 6:34 pm
The presumption of diminished responsibility of youth in murder sentencing under Canadian law and the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA): the case of R. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 12:50 pm
As it is, the United States is the only nation that sentences teenagers who are convicted of a nonhomicide crime to life in prison with no chance of parole. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:31 pm
United States (1878) to Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
On the role of bigotry claims in Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
This is the first such unit in the United States specifically designed to target the emerging BACRIMs. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:19 am
The reasons for this phenomenon are addressed below.First, examiners at the United States Patent and Trademark Office are given very little time to issue Actions on what are often very complex and detailed patent applications. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm
United States 23-1050Issue: Whether a timely filed 21 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:23 pm
“The FDA is improperly allowing drugs into the United States even though it won’t stand behind their safety and efficacy,” he said. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:45 am
Certain to provoke heated debate, Dishonorable Passions is a must-read for anyone interested in the history of sexuality and its regulation in the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:01 am
In Metcalf v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Article III provides that federal courts may hear “cases” and “controversies,” including “all cases, in law and equity, arising under . . . the laws of the United States . . . . [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But it has often played a similar role in historical writing on the United States after the Revolution, and especially in historical writing on federalism. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 2:26 pm
We will have to wait and see how the United States Supreme Court decides this issue, should it eventually take such a case. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:19 pm
The Bertinos argued that the ordinance violated the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:19 pm
The Bertinos argued that the ordinance violated the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
