Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 1281 - 1300 of 22,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 12:19 pm by Unknown
Cranford (Reserved Water Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlPamela J. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:17 pm by Arkady Itkin
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeal held that section 42 USC 1981 prohibits employer from discriminating against United States citizens, because an employer that does so gives one class of people – noncitizens, or perhaps some group of noncitizens – a greater right to make contract than “white citizens”. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:03 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3472464 “In the wake of the 2013 United States Supreme Court decision of McBurney v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 8:26 am by Michael Lumer
The cases are proceeding in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York but ought to be airing on the Bravo network. [read post]
2 May 2013, 12:57 pm by Adam Gillette
People with a keen grasp of legal history may recall that from the time that the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
Rather, it's more like an otherwise intelligent person who currently believes -- for whatever reason -- that the law is X even though anyone (even a moron) with any sort of legal training would realize that the law is clearly not X and is instead Y.For example, what if I -- an otherwise bright person -- were to suddenly become convinced that the 17th Amendment granted me ownership of every red Lexus in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v, Rozier upheld laws charging possession of a weapon by a convicted felon against Second Amendment claims. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:26 pm
The development of a unified Second Amendment jurisprudence is of particularly practical benefit in light of the relatively nascent state of the jurisprudence due to the confusion sown by United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
S. ____ (2023) 1 ALITO, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 22A901 _________________ DANCO LABORATORIES, LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:15 pm
§ 1983 for infringing on their right to familial integrity under the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:41 pm by John Bellinger
Last Friday afternoon, while many people were enjoying a long July 4th weekend, the Obama Administration quietly filed a remarkably strong amicus brief  urging the Supreme Court to reverse the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Bauman v. [read post]