Search for: "United States v. Stevens"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 4,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2011, 10:18 pm
Air Force personnel in Germany (United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:05 am
United States; JURIST has coverage of both cases, while the Conglomerate offers a round-table on questions raised by Erica P. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:27 pm
Even the United States government knows this, but their solution is for Mexico to militarize its police forces, as the United States has already done. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 5:18 am
When the United States Supreme Court decides an issue, it is binding on all federal courts throughout the country. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:58 am
The Fifth Circuit did no better in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
For example, it leaves unprotected US citizens who purchase or sell securities outside the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:10 am
” Justice Stevens, joined by Justices Thomas and Breyer, stated their disagreement in a lengthy dissent. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:21 am
United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 7:29 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 5:54 am
Rather, the Court stated that “Section 10(b) reaches the use of a manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance only in connection with the purchase or sale of a security listed on an American stock exchange, and the purchase or sale of any other security in the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:37 am
At the Concurring Opinions blog, Gerard Magliocca has a post titled “Interesting Cases You’ve Never Heard of – The Pueblo Indians” in which he discusses the Court’s 1876 opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:23 pm
President Barack Obama delivered his State of the Union address this evening, and it was even less exciting than last year (which was less exciting than the year before, when the famous Obama v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:57 pm
Phelps and United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
They have tended to exempt transactions in foreign companies even if the sale occured in the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:45 pm
We've had a chance now to read - no, make that "study" - the Wyeth v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 5:19 am
In preparing for trial, Gardner filed several motions that were directed at keeping certain evidence out and also “notified the United States that [at trial] he intends to rely on the testimony of Steven Moshlak, whom Gardner has designated as an expert in computer forensics. [read post]
