Search for: "Washington v. Roberts" Results 1281 - 1300 of 4,231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Monday’s decision in Evenwel v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” A Washington Legal Foundation video features a discussion of the cert petition in appointments clause case Gordon v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court issued one decision, in Liu v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm by Josh Blackman
It appears to us that Roberts assigned himself the Court's per curiam opinion in Trump v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
This is the reason Chief Justice Roberts was recused in the case of Hamdan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post that “[t]wo of the court’s four liberals suggested the unique history of the Peace Cross in the Washington suburb of Bladensburg, Md., may provide a way to accommodate its position on public land in a highway median. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
At The Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Richard Samp discusses Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Gamble v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:11 am
Roberts, Jr., writing for an eight-member majority in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm by Orin Kerr
  Chief Justice Roberts will likely vote to uphold the mandate given the very  expansive views of the Necessary and Proper clause that he signed on to just recently in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:44 pm by Ronald Mann
Rarely have I read a set of opinions that so closely tracked the discussion at oral argument as the opinions this morning in Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v Lundgren. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:15 am by Kiran Bhat
In an op-ed in the Washington Post, George Will urges the Court to grant cert. in Harmon v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Bravin reports that Chief Justice John Roberts “has emerged as the deciding vote” in these disputes, just as he did in many of the significant cases during the 2019-20 term. [read post]