Search for: "Welling v. Welling" Results 1281 - 1300 of 110,227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am by Eleonora Rosati
The applicant's argument that these registrations were as well made in bad faith lacks specificity, as they merely broadly refer to over 40 marks without distinguishing their individual, underlying intentions. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm by Jack Garvey
The brief was drafted with the guidance of Professor James May and assistance from Montana local counsel, as well as other amici who supported their arguments. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:33 am by Nedim Malovic
According to case law, applicants typically face difficulties in demonstrating the inherent distinctiveness of non-conventional trade marks and this is testified by the fact that most cases pertaining to non-conventional trade marks, spanning from 2021 to 2024, deal with the issue of inherent distinctiveness.The significant departure test for distinctivenessFor a trade mark to possess distinctive character, it must serve to identify the goods in respect of which registration is applied for as… [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
… Canadian Privacy Law Blog OKImportant new Ontario court decision on privilege in incident response documentation The Ontario divisional court has just released a decision, LifeLabs LP v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 2:08 am by Etienne Farnoux
The benefit of putative marriage, as well as the possibility of celebrating the marriage again when majority has been reached, constitute sufficient guarantees to limit the effects of nullity in the legal order of the forum. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:43 am by Rose Hughes
That is, the claim is interpreted to cover both the corresponding structure, material, or act described in the Specification, as well as equivalents of that structure, material, or act. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
On February 23, 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]