Search for: "West v. People"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 3,465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
Bill Ruthhart of the Indianapolis Star reports this afternoon on the Supreme Court decision earlier today in the case of City of Carmel, Indiana v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
We reiterate, however, that each case is fact specific (see, People v West, 271 AD2d 806; People v Brooks, 270 AD2d 206, lv denied 95 NY2d 794; People v Parr, 155 AD2d 945, lv denied 75 NY2d 870 [all holding that a defendant who performs a significant act of domestic violence against a mother in the presence of a child is guilty of endangering the welfare of that child]). [95 N.Y.2d 374] With respect to defendant's appeal, the… [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Benn was co-counsel for Johnson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:03 pm
Soilworks LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Lucas (1983) and Schweiker v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:38 pm
Hager v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
U-Haul Co. of West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
There are lots of young, fit, good-looking people playing volleyball or working out. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am
They do make claims for themselves, but not ownership or origination claims even though they might be adding creativity the west would consider copyrightable. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Bobby Scott (D-Va.) in the Zubik v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:15 am
Disagreeing, the appeals court held that the Supreme Court’s decision in Gross v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 3:32 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 3:32 pm
People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm
Kohn, Syracuse University College of Law Thursday (Jan. 7) - 3:30 to 4:45P Hilton, Nassau West, 2nd Floor Law, Medicine and Health Care Works-In-Progress for New Law School Teachers Contracting for Results in Health Care? [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
Sandford, and Plessy v. [read post]
