Search for: "Will Baude"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2024, 1:25 pm
Along similar lines, Will Baude wrote in the Times, "the court sees itself as trying to save the country from other institutions' disproportionate responses to Mr. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
[Scholars and lawyers should exercise caution before citing a new paper by James Heilpern and Michael T. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Here are the results, sorted by the texts that included the greatest number of our 100 cases: Choper, Dorf, Fallon, and Schauer: 80 cases Stone, Seidman, Sunstein, Tushnet, & Karlan: 73 cases Chemerinsky: 71 cases Maggs & Smith: 69 cases Farmer, Eskridge, Frickey, and Schacter: 68 cases Varat & Amar: 67 cases Brest, Levinson, Balkin, Amar, & Siegel: 64 cases Feldman & Sullivan: 64 cases Paulsen, Calabresi, McConnell, Bray, and Baude: 63 cases Weaver, Friedland,… [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:15 pm
”, which told me that the maximum baud setting was 460800. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:22 pm
Three authors were cited in three observations – William Baude, Anthony Bellia and Bradford Clark. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
As Will Baude cogently wrote about analogous developments in capital cases, accomplishing such a shift through a series of unexplained, unreasoned summary orders “is no way to run a railroad. [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 6:18 pm
If Will Baude can seriously contemplate leaving Crescat Sententia, I wonder why should Belle Lettre not use Law and Letters as an occasional blog, and join, say, the Jurisdynamics network officially? [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
To similar effect, University of Chicago Law Professor William Baude argued in a 2018 article in the California Law Review, the modern doctrine of qualified immunity does not closely resemble the common-law background against which the Reconstruction Congress legislated—so even assuming judicial authority to read defenses as preserved by statutes that are silent with respect to defenses, the modern doctrine would not be justified.Given the convergence of criticism from the left and… [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
A few possibilities (with thanks to my colleague Will Baude for helping me think through the permutations): First, the court of appeals might say that the Tax Court is part of the Legislative Branch. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
A few possibilities (with thanks to my colleague Will Baude for helping me think through the permutations): First, the court of appeals might say that the Tax Court is part of the Legislative Branch. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
See generally Baude, Is Qualified Immunity Unlawful? [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:11 am
Our work built on what Professor William Baude has written about the court’s “special solicitude” for defendants in qualified immunity cases. [read post]
31 May 2020, 1:29 pm
University of Chicago law professor and Volokh Conspiracy co-blogger Will Baude explains why the doctrine lacks any valid legal basis in this excellent article. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
See, Baude, William. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
” Commentary comes from Will Baude at PrawfsBlawg, who wonders what the debate between the majority and the dissent about the principles governing the application of stare decisis in the case “implies about other judge-made doctrines that might hit the Court’s docket in the future. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
” Additional coverage comes from Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller and Bob Egelko at the San Francisco Chronicle, Additional commentary and analysis come from Adam Serwer at The Atlantic, Aaron Blake at The Washington Post, Leah Litman at Take Care, Aziz Huq at Take Care, Richard Primus, also at Take Care, Michelle Boorstein at The Washington Post, Peter Schuck in an op-ed for The New York Times, Will Baude at PrawfsBlawg, Dana Milbank in an op-ed for The Washington Post, and Shirin… [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:31 pm
" They cite Will Baude's article in the California Law Review, as well as a rejoinder from Aaron Nielson and Chris Walker. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
Meanwhile, as Professors William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen have documented in a widely cited forthcoming article in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, there are other oddities of Griffin’s Case that make it a particularly poor authority on the meaning of Section 3.Trump’s team will lodge other objections. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm
As co-blogger Will Baude demonstrated in a pathbreaking 2013 Yale Law Journal article (cited by the dissenters), the dominant view at the time of the Founding and for many years thereafter was that the federal government did not have a general power to use eminent domain within the states. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:27 am
My VC colleague Will Baude helped me add the qualifier about the criminal case being filed by the government, as in Robertson v. [read post]
