Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 2,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2020, 10:47 am
For example, yesterday's order in RNC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm
S., at 158 (citing Manning, supra, at 655– 668); Decker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:56 pm
S. 716, 731 (1931); see also Gibbons v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:01 am
That’s what the appellate panel ruled in the March 2019 case of Restal v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm
The word “accompany” does not connote movement over a substantial distance. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:48 am
Case in point: Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Lawrence Knipel’s recent decision in Matter of Lev v Rosenberg, 2019 NY Slip Op 30824(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Mar. 13, 2019]. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 2:11 pm
See Coon v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
Thus, the High Court reversed the judgment of the Supreme Court of Colorado which had affirmed a finding that ATSA immunity did not apply to a pilot’s defamation claim against an airline for reporting to the TSA that an “[u]nstable” pilot had been fired and that he might be carrying a firearm, which is allowed for any federal flight deck officer (FFDO) (Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp v Hoeper, January 27, 2014, Sotomayor, S). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
U. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:34 am
Whether petitioners' suit challenging HHS's adjustments is precluded by 42 U. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
In Impression Products v. [read post]
Precedential No. 31: TTAB Dismisses U. Alabama Opposition to HOUNDSTOOTH MAFIA & Design for Clothing
29 Jul 2013, 2:51 am
Bryant, Jr. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:32 am
Just two years later, Alito wrote the Court's opinion in Murphy v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:12 am
Bockting, 549 U. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
In other words, the government's ability to conduct a warrantless follow-up search of this kind is expressly limited by the scope of the initial private search. [read post]
13 May 2013, 1:19 pm
” 49 U. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:25 am
V. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
After noting the factual basis for the charges against Davis, the judge outlined the standard of review he was to apply in ruling on her motion for a new trial: A district court, `[u]pon the defendant's motion . . . may vacate any judgment and grant a new trial if the interest of justice so requires. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:33 am
It’s adorable, really. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:57 pm
Today, the Texas Supreme Court issued opinions in Severance v. [read post]
