Search for: "admin" Results 1281 - 1300 of 5,817
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2020, 6:07 pm
 This an approved for posting ( (c) Rumpole/Covid19 communications, Inc, 2020, all rights reserved)  communication by our admin judge in criminal court: (We keep forgetting who MFK is- no disrespect to a fine jurist we are sure, but shouldn't someone be around for a few dozen years to earn the right to be called by their initials- RBG for Justice Ginsberg for example?) [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:15 am by Parrish McLeod
As Maginnis Law’s attorneys and admin staff begin working from home, we ask that clients and potential clients will still call/leave voicemails (919.526.0450) and email us at info@maginnislaw.com. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 4:58 am
RUNDLE RELENTS: After Public Defender Carlos Martinez took the lead and announced that PD employees would be able to take administrative leave if they had child care issues, your State Attorney changed her position on Saturday and allowed SAO employees to take Admin leave if the hyave childcare issues. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:30 am by Unknown
This brief explainer describes how the country reports are used.Finally, Newsweek reported the following: "Trump Admin Acknowledges Human Rights Abuses Against Migrants in Mexico Were Happening Before It Forced Them to 'Remain' There" [text] [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 21 February 2020 the Administrative Court handed down judgment in Short v The Falkland Islands [2020] EWHC 439 (Admin), dealing with the Court’s power to anonymise an individual subject  to extradition proceedings for an alleged sexual offence. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 3:28 am by J
Inclusion Housing Community Interest Company v Regulator of Social Housing [2020] EWHC 346 (Admin) I think this is the first judicial review of a regulatory decision by the Regulator of Social Housing and whilst, ultimately, the result is a fairly standard example of the limits of judicial review, the context is important and worthy of note. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:54 am by SHG
Of course, there’s a lot of additional baggage judges carry with them that don’t burden college admins. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:41 am by Yi W. Stewart
Recognizing that “law must advance with the technology to ensure the continued vitality of the fourth amendment” 33 years ago (S Rep 99-541, 99th Congr, 2nd Sess, reprinted in 1986 US Code Cong & Admin News at 3559), Congress enacted the ECPA to amend the federal wiretap law of 1968 by extending to “electronic communications” the privacy protection against unauthorized interception (id. at 3555). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Dave
In R(M) v Newham LBC (2020) EWHC 327 (Admin), these were the apparently vexed, but important, questions for Linden J, in circumstances which the evidence suggested were pretty awful (and I wonder if Newham might reflect that this was a poor case to run, even though the question of law requires authoritative judgment). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Dave
In R(M) v Newham LBC (2020) EWHC 327 (Admin), these were the apparently vexed, but important, questions for Linden J, in circumstances which the evidence suggested were pretty awful (and I wonder if Newham might reflect that this was a poor case to run, even though the question of law requires authoritative judgment). [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The decision in R (Miller) v (1) The College of Policing, and (2) The Chief Constable of Humberside [2020] EWHC 225 (Admin) tackles police recording, retention and dissemination of information about individuals in relation to “non-crime” hate  incidents. [read post]