Search for: "*stanley v. Stanley" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,777
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2010, 10:53 am by Paul Caron
Following up on my prior post, Supreme Court: UC-Hastings Can Require Christian Legal Society to Admit Gays/Lesbians to Receive School Recognition: in today's New York Times, Being Neutral Is Oh So Hard to Do, by Stanley Fish: In the opening paragraph of his dissent in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:01 am
About 6 degrees off-beam should be okay (see Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith, here). [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:42 pm by Moderator
The tax loss to the U.S., the lawyer said, was about $60,000.The case is United States of America v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Snippets can be downloaded here: http://www.mbhb.com/snippets/bilski Topics include: Viewpoints on Life After Bilski v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"James Franco Shows Three Shorts in Palm Springs, Explains Career Plan" http://j.mp/dheaow copyrights & campaigns blog on "Viacom v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:08 pm by Adam Winkler
Last week, the Supreme Court decided Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:55 am by INFORRM
Lord Justice Waller held (with Ward and Stanley Burton LJJ agreeing ) “It seems to me that the claimant is likely to establish that his Article 8 rights are engaged. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 2:28 am
Last year the IPKat reported on a fiercely-contested preliminary skirmish in the battle of the dairies in JN Dairies Ltd v Johal Dairies Ltd, Gurbir Singh, where a scheduled four-day hearing took twice as long thanks to a superfluity of witness evidence (see earlier IPKat comment here). [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Jay Willis
Kappos, McDonald v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:54 am
Lee), or seizing adult pornography in the home which is a constitutionally protected right (Stanley v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:28 pm
 Monday's decision in Kapruski v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
The Stanley Works (Docket Report) District Court C D California: Failure to allege lack of substantial noninfringing use sinks contributory infringement claim: Clayton v. [read post]