Search for: "Anderson v. State" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,812
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am by Legal Beagle
The revelations came in a hearing in the case of  Heather Capital Ltd (In Liquidation) v Levy & McRae and others - naming suspended Sheriff Peter Watson amid a series of allegations in relation to the £400m collapse of the Heather Capital Hedge Fund. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Quick answer: no” [David Henderson; WSJ/@scottlincicome on seasonal pool-supply company] Hillary Clinton and the Market Basket Stores myth [James Taranto] Labor Department proposes tightening regulation of retirement financial advisers [Kenneth Bentsen, The Hill] Proposed: “well-orchestrated” state ballot initiatives aimed at overturning employment at will [Rand Wilson, Workplace Fairness] My view: “Everybody wins with at-will employment” [Ethan Blevins,… [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:45 am by Gregory Forman
In a criminal appeal that has implications for family law attorneys who defend abuse and neglect proceedings, on August 5, 2015, in the case of State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
As reported in a press release on Tuesday from Jeff Anderson & Associates, two new clergy abuse lawsuits were filed this week in state court in Minnesota:Civil lawsuits were filed today by two men who were sexually abused as minors by clergy at Crosier Seminary in Onamia, Minn. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:10 am
Board of Education in the 1980s (Anderson 2011). [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 7:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Insurance contracts are interpreted according to state law, and the various state courts diverge widely on issues surrounding insurance coverage. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 8:56 am by Venkat Balasubramani
July 20, 2015) Related posts: In Hannaford Data Breach Case, First Circuit Says Card Replacement and ID Theft Insurance are Reasonable Mitigation Damages and Compensable–Anderson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a very rare outcome, in the case of R (Davis and ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin) the Divisional Court declared that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) is inconsistent with European Union law and therefore is “disapplied”, although the Court suspended the effect of its order until after 31 March 2016. [read post]