Search for: "Andrews v. Andrews" Results 1301 - 1320 of 7,424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2008, 10:31 am
New York Blawger Andrew Lavoot Bluestone, who writes the New York Attorney Malpractice Blog, was found liable last week by the First Department for impermissible advertising prohibited by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (47 USC § 227) (Stern v Bluestone, 2008 NY Slip Op 00611). [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:28 am by Eric Goldman
Under either definition, the court says Alex Andrews has standing based on these complaint allegations: Andrews founded a sex worker-led, community forum called Rate That Rescue. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 6:16 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Professor Andrew Beveridge analyzes the effects of such a change in the report The Threat to Representation for Children and Non-Citizens: An Analysis of the Potential Impact of Evenwel v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:43 am by sally
Bilta (UK) Ltd (in liquidation) and others v Nazir and others [2012] EWHC 2163 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 236 “Section 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986 had extraterritorial effect. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:54 am by Howard Bashman
Andrew Chung of Reuters reports that “US Supreme Court indicates it may sidestep major elections ruling. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:13 am by Andrew Hamm
Andrew Cain also reports on the Court’s order for the Richmond Times-Dispatch. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 5:15 am
The suit is Deajess Medical Imaging, P.C., et al., v. [read post]
15 May 2025, 5:51 am by Frank Fagan
Andrew Chin (U North Carolina Law) has posted “The Black Box Presidency” on SSRN. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:53 am
 By Robert Milligan and summer associate Andrew Larratt-Smith In a decision that encourages cost efficient corporate mergers in Nevada, the Nevada Supreme Court in HD Supply Facilities Maintenance v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:44 pm by David Kopel
(David Kopel) A recent Yale Law Journal Online article by Northwestern law professor Andrew Koppelman argues that the Obamacare individual mandate is obviously constitutional, especially in light of how McCulloch v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:06 pm by Liskow & Lewis
By Andrew Wooley On May 8, 2015, the Supreme Court of Texas held in Phillips v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:06 pm by Liskow & Lewis
By Andrew Wooley On May 8, 2015, the Supreme Court of Texas held in Phillips v. [read post]