Search for: "Anthony M Kennedy" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
The 5-4 ruling, with Justice John Paul Stevens writing for the majority, was announced in his absence by Justice Anthony M. [read post]
7 May 2007, 12:05 am
Julia FrankAssociate Professor of Psychiatry and Director of Medical Student Education in PsychiatryGeorge Washington University School of MedicineJustice Anthony Kennedy in Gonzales v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:33 am by Nancy Leong
Johnson (the founder of Black Entertainment Television), Reverend Anthony T. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:27 am by Steve Hall
The 5-to-4 decision divided the court along ideological lines, with Justice Anthony M. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg did not seem inclined in favor of such points, either, and Justice Anthony M. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
The denial of review in those cases, in contrast to Monday's action, brought an opinion by two Justices (John Paul Stevens and Anthony M. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
“For me, the case turns in large part on this,” Justice Anthony M. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 12:09 pm by Seth Waxman
Justice Anthony Kennedy and the chief justice each expressed “surprise” that the United States would place at risk so many guilty pleas that were otherwise final. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:24 am by Lyle Denniston
He strongly resisted when Justice Anthony M. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:35 am by Lyle Denniston
That Dreeben was not making much headway seemed clear when Justice Anthony M. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:25 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El juez Anthony Kennedy expresó que dos adultos que consentían poseen un derecho fundamental a practicar el tipo y forma de relación sexual que deseen porque está protegido por el concepto de libertad e intimidad del debido proceso de ley de la enmienda 14. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm by James Romoser
Justice Anthony Kennedy announces the opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]