Search for: "Application of Gray" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,785
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Judgment The application was heard on 25 February 2011 by Coulson J who gave judgment on 2 March 2011 ([2011] EWHC 406 (QB)). [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:13 am by SHG
  The application isn't a plea for vanity, but the constitutional right to present a defense unaffected by extraneous and improper forces. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:06 am by litigationtech
Some of our courts are already using wide-screen flat panel monitors, so it is much nicer to use the full screen, rather than have the gray side boxes cropping the image. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:32 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 2 March 2011, the Court of Appeal will hear the application for permission to appeal in the case of Kaschke v Gray (against the decision of Stadley J in [2010] EWHC 690 (QB)). [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
Hy-Grade Valve Inc (Gray on Claims) (Maier & Maier) (Docket Report) (Inventive Step) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am by INFORRM
Mr Justice Vos On Friday 25 February 2011 Mr Justice Vos handed down judgment in relation to various applications made in the “phone hacking” claims against the News of the World and Glenn Mulcaire by Gray and Steve Coogan. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am by INFORRM
Latest Cases Gray v News Group [2011] EWHC 349 (Ch) – 25 Feb 2011. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:16 am by Matt Osenga
Thanks to Gray on Claims for keeping track of the large number of false marking cases being filed and decided. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:16 am by INFORRM
Mr Justice Vos will, today, hand down judgment in the application brought by Andy Gray and Steve Coogan against Glenn Mulcaire to disclose the names of those persons who had instructed him to intercept voice messages of the Claimants. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:04 am by INFORRM
  First, there was the application by Steve Coogan and Andy Gray – heard over 3 days by Mr Justice Vos in the Chancery Division. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
§ 112, 2nd Paragraph (Patent Docs) Summary of false marking settlements May – December 2010 (GRAY on Claims) Article One announces $25,000 bonus for 2010 (Article One Partners Blog) Should I request ex parte or inter partes reexamination? [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Next Week in the Courts On Monday 14 February 2011,  in the Queens Bench division Mr Justice Supperstone will give judgment in the privacy case of POI v A Person Known as “Lina” (No.2) and, in the Chancery division Mr Justice Vos will hear the adjourned applications for the provision of information in the cases of  Gray v NGN and Mulcaire and Coogan v NGN and Glenn Mulcaire On Thursday 17 February 2011 there is a hearing in the “phone hacking”… [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 5:44 am by INFORRM
IHC 40/11 Gray & anr v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd IHC 41/11 Coogan & anr v Same IHC 72/11 Same v Same IHC 73/11 Same v Same These concern the “phone hacking” cases of Andy Gray and Steve Coogan and are applications for disclosure against Glenn Mulcaire which were adjourned from 18 January 2011. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:49 am by Ken Lopez
While his works do not directly relate to courtroom presentation, his ideas and theory of how to appeal to an audience are highly regarded; the underlying theme of his ideas is directly applicable to litigation presentations. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by Marie Louise
Bridgeport Fittings (Gray on Claims) CAFC: The teeth of KSR: Obviousness on summary judgment: Tokai Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm by Sam Eichner
The merchandise, which reached Costco by way of the gray goods market, was part of Omega’s regional market segmentation strategy. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
  Libel claim concerning articles in “Panjab Times” stayed by Sir Charles Gray on the ground that it raised non-justiciable issues of religious doctrine. [read post]