Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 3,267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
In May 2006, following a bench trial, the Superior Court of California found the Attorney General's lawsuit preempted by federal law. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 9:21 am
The parties in the case of Bierig-Kiejdan v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 4:59 am
In 2004, the Ontario Court of Appeal released the decision D.P. v Wagg, 2004 CanLII 39048 (Wagg). [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Next, the court rehashed the issue of the civilian defense attorneys’ absence. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:30 am
Lovlace v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 3:30 pm
See Frey v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:21 am
In FTI, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:38 pm
Despite this, the Court held that UPS could not recover its attorney fees. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:34 pm
Muller, filed in Suffolk, Mass., Superior Court, KNF&T alleged its former vice president Charlotte Muller violated her non-compete contract in a variety of ways, including her announcement of her new job on LinkedIn. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
In California Traditions, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
Finding that this case falls squarely within the definitional exclusion of CAFA, the court ultimately held that AOL cannot remove this private attorney general suit to federal court pursuant to CAFA. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
Arnold v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 4:28 am
The Hamilton Superior Court acquitted Jackson, and the Court of Appeals affirmed in State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:01 am
Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 37. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
If you are looking for a good general outline of statutory interpretation of veterans benefits statutes, the Court does a great job of laying that analysis out. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
See Towers v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Such a split among lower courts is generally seen as a powerful reason for the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania vacated the Superior Court’s ruling and remanded the case back to the Superior Court for reconsideration.[11] Perhaps most importantly, the Supreme Court rejected the Superior Court’s suggestion that the rule of capture does not apply to hydraulic fracturing due to the fact that hydraulic fracturing is an artificial means to stimulate production. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:04 pm
Citing a prior decision, the court explained that a defendant’s attorney may stipulate to an element of a charged crime and that an attorney is presumed to have the authority to act on behalf of his or her client during trial, including while stipulating to elements. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Recent Brain Research Continues to Find Significant Differences Between Adolescents and Adults The Center for Law and Brain Behavior at Massachusetts General Hospital released a White Paper on the Science of Late Adolescence: A Guide for Judges, Attorneys and Policy Makers in January of 2022. [read post]
