Search for: "B/T Enterprises"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2012, 5:19 pm
The ruling concluded that “[t]he risk to the funds of the defendants’ investors far exceeded the 3% discount which was supposedly to be committed to the futures markets” because of the possibility of a rapid decrease in the applicable market or of the pool being required to take delivery of costly Treasury bills pursuant to a future contract.That does not provide much help for private equity funds and real estate private equity funds." [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:10 am
I don’t mean to scare you, but if not properly understood and applied to your own law practice, this tip—the tip of the iceberg—could end up sinking your entire enterprise. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
– and the enterprising plaintiff in search of a deep pocket has instead sued a company that supplied an active ingredient or component part to the manufacturer. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:32 am
Significantly, and as noted below, the complaint relates not just to the accounting improprieties at Autonomy, but also to the earlier $8 billion goodwill charge associated with H-P’s Enterprise Services business, as noted below. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
We don’t like seeing defendants pointing fingers at each other. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am
Some of the drug crimes under the Controlled Substances Act include: Drug trafficking: manufacturing, distributing or possessing with the intent to distribute illicit drugs Manufacturing: operating places for the purposes of manufacturing, distributing or using illicit drugs, or endangering human life while so doing Continuing criminal enterprise crimes: trafficking in illicit drugs by a person in concert with five or more other persons Conspiracy: involves attempts and the promoting and… [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Superior Court (Monex), 176 Cal.App.4th 1554 (2009);andnbsp;andnbsp; ATandamp;T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 6:41 pm
University of Calgary ("Pridgen") stating: "[t]he fourth tweet, as we have labelled it, is therefore saved under sub-section 2(b) of the Charter as an exercise of the Respondent's freedom of expression. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 8:25 am
" Finally, he concludes that the government and nonprofits should "compensate for the underallocation of resources to invention by private enterprises," but notes that this raises "two problems" for which he doesn't really have answers: "how shall the amount of resources devoted to invention be determined, and how shall efficiency in their use be encouraged? [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am
http://bit.ly/RN4gfL (@OrangeLT) Case In Point: 30(B)(6) Witnesses? [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 10:58 am
The client was tech-savvy and had access to some serious hardware; B. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 1:53 pm
Being busy working up some new medical marijuana cases myself, I didn’t get around to it. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 6:04 am
The lawsuit also asserted that the male cashier called the employee offensive gender-based epithets such as “b—h,” “c—t” and “p—y” on a frequent basis. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:26 am
Addressing just such an argument, the District Court for the Middle District of Florida reasoned that: [t]he list provided in the regulations of businesses which are recognized as retail reflects that such narrow interpretation would be incorrect. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:59 am
There’s no reason you couldn’t provide for that use under the contract, but without expressly doing so in the contract you likely wouldn’t be able to do so. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 11:43 am
(b) Obama wins, Senate stays Democratic. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:13 am
State-owned enterprises are subject to an additional layer of review in Canada under Investment Canada’s SOE Guidelines that set out additional factors (relating to the corporate governance and commercial orientation of the SOE) in addition to the general net benefit to Canada factors in section 20 of the ICA. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 11:28 am
But she said her mother "didn't want her," and so she went back to the defendants. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 12:16 pm
” Paragraph 3(b)(xiv) of the Rules of the Policy. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:19 pm
It's absolutely unambiguous.The Constitution says that the federal government can do A, B, C, and D. [read post]
