Search for: "BROWN v. MARKS" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix.
Fourthly, there was a side debate about whether the summary of the Hardial Singh principles in R (I) v SSHD [2002] EWCA Civ 888 by Dyson LJ (as he then was) was accurate. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 10:15 am by Mike Scarcella
Salazar, allege the attorney, Mark Brown, abandoned his clients, alienated class counsel and should not get paid. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Jordan Furlong
Law Firm Investment Portfolios built on Ron and Toby’s work, a post by V. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
I’ve recently started working on a book about reformers’ ideologies and strategies in Sheff v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
This devolution jurisdiction was first exercised by the Privy Council to rule on allegations of Convention rights violations by the prosecution in both solemn procedure (Montgomery v HMA 2001 SC (PC) 1, 19 October 2000) and summary criminal procedure (Brown v Stott 2001 SC (PC) 43, 5 December 2000). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 4:49 am by John L. Welch
If the mark was not abandoned then Brown owned it, based on Newton's transfer to him of the mark and its continuous use thereafter. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am by INFORRM
  Desmond Browne QC representing Mark Lewis submitted that the allegations complained of were plainly defamatory and serious allegations and that Police as a public authority could not rely upon qualified privilege following recent authority (see Clift v Slough BC [2010] EWCA Civ 1484). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The other two witnesses were Professor Dan Burk (UC Irvine) and Andrew Pincus (Mayer Brown, representing BSA). [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:28 am by INFORRM
The point was considered in the seminal decision of Eady J in McKennitt v Ash [2006] EMLR 10. [read post]