Search for: "Brooks v. THE STATE" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2022, 1:33 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Ancestry Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts: Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (30 March 2011): Supreme Court: Teachers employed by Sec of State to work abroad at European Schools entitled to the protection against unfair dismissal – see the Education Law Blog. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 3:54 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
In his attempt to have the defamation lawsuit dismissed, Musk tried to claim that, because of his involvement in the very public rescue of the group of boys, Unsworth should be classified as a public figure, but Judge Stephen V. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm by Steve Hall
CST for his conviction in the slayings of Eddie Brooks and Everett Curry during a pair of gas station holdups. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
This statement was referred to with approval by Sir Edward Coke in Co Litt 42a (1628), and much the same is stated in Brook’s New Cases (1554/5) pl 462. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
This statement was referred to with approval by Sir Edward Coke in Co Litt 42a (1628), and much the same is stated in Brook’s New Cases (1554/5) pl 462. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:36 am
Montana’s Original Sin By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore Garrett Epps writes about Espinoza v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:18 am by James Bickford
” At the Blog of Legal Times, Tony Mauro reports on an amicus brief filed by nine states and Puerto Rico in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:09 am
  In a matter of first impression, the Court addressed the impact the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Desert Palace, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 5:25 pm
With offices in Chicago and its outskirts, near Oak Brook, Wheaton and Naperville, Ill., we represent clients in Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin and throughout the United States. [read post]