Search for: "Brown v. People" Results 1301 - 1320 of 3,405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Gershman, and Clark Neily; “Florida lawmakers just voted to create a public registry of people caught paying or attempting to pay for sex….it will certainly transfer private money to the state, give bureaucrats something to do, and provide the public with people to gawk at and judge” [Elizabeth Nolan Brown, Reason] Wisconsin: “County Pays $90,000 Settlement To Man After Seizing $80,000 Judgment From Him Using 24 Deputies And An Armored… [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Legal luminaries from across the ideological spectrum, moreover, have often contended that affirmative action marks Black and brown people as substandard. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 11:49 am
Appointing a former politician to the court would almost certainly introduce a more populist element: the Supreme Court that in 1954 decided Brown v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:29 pm by Anders Walker
  Just came across a letter by Ralph Ellison responding to William Faulkner's defense of a moderate, gradualist approach to Brown v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 12:03 am
Supreme Court precedents that Anna cites, meanwhile, is Uttecht v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
The two married in 1955 — one year after Thurgood successfully argued Brown v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:02 pm
People v Brown, 1642, 1566/06, 5155/06, 5903/06, 5995/07, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 8959; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:45 am by David Lat
Plata [Josh Blackman] Scalia’s Greatest Hits in Brown v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 8:29 pm by Alfred Brophy
  So much of the commentary has been on Atticus Finch's fall from hero status when we learn that he's a supporter of the local White Citzens Council and that he debates Jean Louise over the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
  Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] established that, even if most people are not deceived, passing off can still be proved. [read post]