Search for: "C&J Investments" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2011, 12:07 pm by Sheppard Mullin
(2) Such regulations shall include the following provisions: (A) In the case of an item or process that is developed by a contractor or subcontractor exclusively with Federal funds (other than an item or process developed under a contract or subcontract to which regulations under section 9(j)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638 (j)(2)) apply), the United States shall have the unlimited right to— (i) use technical data pertaining to the item or process; or… [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 2:45 am
Smith Director of Enforcement Regional Directors From: Robert J. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
State Senator Diane Savino, State Assemblyman Mathew J. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 2:53 pm
Several bloggers have noted Clayton Gillette's recent article, Law School Faculty as Free Agents, 17 J. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Sept. 22, 2011) f.andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp; Investment Advisors andndash; Procedural and Substantive Unconscionability Parada v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:02 am by Administrator
The crux of the issue was whether the limitation period [within which the plaintiff filed the claim] was governed by the Residential Tenancy Act, S.B.C. 2002, c.78 [RTA]; the Limitation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 266 (the “Old Limitation Act”); or the Limitation Act, S.B.C. 2012, c.13. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 7:00 am by Jan von Hein
The latest issue of the „Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax)“ features the following articles: (These abstracts can also be found at the IPRax-website under the following link: https://www.iprax.de/en/contents/)   J. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am by INFORRM
In chronological order, the eight cases are: 7 November 2018 (Amtsgericht Diez, 07-11-2018, 8 C 130/18) (machine translation here via nyob‘s GDPRhub) the plaintiff sought damages for the receipt of a spam email, but the Local Court of Diez in Germany held that there would be no claim pursuant to Article 82 where there is merely an infringement of the GDPR without causing any damage; 11 March 2019 (Amtsgericht Bochum, 11-03-2019, 65 C 485/18) the Local Court of… [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:43 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers and employee benefit plan administrators deciding whether to approve the request of an employee for leave or other rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) due to the serious illness, birth, adoption or placement of a child with no legal or biological relationship with the employee  should not underestimate the scope of the FMLA’s reach based on recent guidance. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am by Jan von Hein
Considering also the ECJ’s decisions in cases C-78/95 (Hendrikman) and C-327/10 (Hypote? [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am by Florian Mueller
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
D’Amato, Consumer Confusion and Trademark Infringement, J. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm by Kevin Kaufman
These bills would introduce a border-adjusted tax on carbon emissions, with revenue being used for measures such as payroll tax cuts, investments in innovation and infrastructure, and carbon dividends.[1] Businesses in sectors such as energy, food, and transport have publicly called for federal climate action, including a price on carbon.[2] Economists have long argued that a well-designed carbon tax is the most economically efficient way to reduce carbon emissions.[3] A carbon tax is… [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The changing regulatory, societal and investment environment has also created an expectation that directors should consider and act on financial risks caused by climate change and do not participate in greenwashing. [read post]
2 May 2018, 11:16 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
J. 271 (1979) where he argued that the victim has to be provided the option of deciding to go for damages or specific relief depending on which of those two will properly compensate her. [read post]