Search for: "California State Board of Equalization"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am
It won't be able to pursue both conflicting goals equally well -- nobody can. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:54 pm
The mere fact that Concepcion eliminated the Discover Bank rule does not mean that "generally applicable state law unconscionability defenses" are preempted "across the board." [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm
Board of Equalization of California in 1990, involving an array of legislation ranging from child protection laws (Prince), to anti-discrimination laws (Piggie Park, Bob Jones), to wage and hour laws (Tony & Susan Alamo Foundation), to Sunday closing laws (Braunfeld and related cases), to tax requirements (Lee, Covenant Community Church v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:00 pm
The Washington State Supreme Court reached a similar conclusion with respect another mall-upskirter and a man who upskirted little girls in a concession line at the Seattle Center sports arena. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
State consumer protection statutes vary widely on just how these safe harbors (and not every state has one) are phrased, and the statutory terminology makes a difference – as it should. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
That case was argued last Fall but hasn’t yet been decided, and involves the permissibility of state-sponsored prayers before town board meetings. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
Taft Perhaps the best example of competing, side-by-side cost studies comes from the evaluation of the federal facility in Taft, California, operated by The GEO Group. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:35 pm
The equal opportunity policy statement (item (5) above) must be included in the contractor’s AAP and must also be posted on company bulletin boards. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 11:20 am
Evidence of a presentation by the Board of Supervisors to the unions stating that rate pooling would continue at that time only reflected a policy decision for a specified period. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Federal Trade Commission 13-534Issue: Whether, for purposes of the state-action exemption from federal antitrust law, an official state regulatory board created by state law may properly be treated as a “private” actor simply because, pursuant to state law, a majority of the board’s members are also market participants who are elected to their official positions by other market participants. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 4:16 am
The Rules of Practice and Procedure were developed to ensure judicial efficiency, due process and equal protection. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Code, § 1750 et seq.) based on an allegation that a retailer misrepresented that it was collecting an amount as tax reimbursement when in fact the retailer failed to remit the amount to the Board of Equalization? [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:51 am
Hadrin County Board of Ed, et al., 2013 U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:00 pm
A nearly $2 million settlement agreement with a California-based government contractor announced January 15, 2014 by the U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 1:17 pm
AB 919 would provide a procedure for a qualified veteran, who is a person who met specified requirements for being a qualified itinerant vendor to submit a claim for qualified repayments, as defined, with the State Board of Equalization, as provided. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:30 pm
It embraced the system of international law and norms as a capstone regulatory structure that bound both states (including their constitutional orders) and non-state actors (individuals and corporations) in equal measure. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 12:41 pm
California, for one, specifically recognizes a tort of negligent interference with contractual relations, and has a model jury charge on that topic, which you can read here. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:50 pm
This matters, but mostly with a view to a future Apple request for an injunction over whatever patents it may prevail on at the trial in its second California litigation with Samsung (scheduled to begin on March 31, 2014), where some more impactful patents are at issue.It's important to focus on the asserted patents, not the accused products. [read post]
