Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 4,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2022, 7:24 am
In South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am
As my fellow amicus Mike Dorf explains, it appears likely the Supreme Court will rule for California and the House of Representatives in California v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
University of Texas. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:23 pm
Dannenberg, but no reference to the seminal case, Daubert v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:59 pm
The court announced on Monday that it would not take up Texas v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:23 am
Three years ago, in Daimler AG v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:25 pm
The jury never saw the V-Plot video. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:11 pm
I have argued that the logic and consequences of the Massachusetts analysis are not satisfying and would not be followed under Texas law. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:23 pm
T.S. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:50 am
See Texas Supreme Court Declines to Follow Hall Street in Arbitration Case: Nafta Traders, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:01 pm
A full en banc Ninth Circuit has agreed to rehear Olson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:21 am
In Robinson v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am
Univ., which will decide the meaning of “supervisor” under Title VII, and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm
Texas (DAPA) 2014 Joined blue states amicus brief in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:17 pm
Drug Enforcement Administration did finally bump CBD from a Schedule I to a Schedule V narcotic (the least harmful of controlled substances). [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:46 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Court of Appeals of Texas – El Paso: Long v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 578–79 (2003) (quoting Bowers v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
On the civil side: First up are California v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:51 am
This is not the first time that Plaintiff has filed a trade mark infringement, false advertising and right of publicity suit against a retailer over the use of a Henley shirt, as Plaintiff filed a similar suit in Texas in 1999, Henley v. [read post]
