Search for: "Christian v. State" Results 1301 - 1320 of 3,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am by Kiran Bhat
” The editorial board of the Christian Science Monitor frames the health care debate as an issue of state sovereignty. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:57 am by Marissa Miller
The Wall Street Journal‘s Jess Bravin (subscription required) and the Christian Science Monitor’s Patrik Jonsson report that Massachusetts officials have challenged the Chief Justice’s statements at oral argument that the state has the worst ratio of African American voter turnout to white voter turnout. [read post]
30 May 2010, 7:16 am by John Inazu
They remain relevant in light of the Court's forthcoming decision in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Christian, in which the court held that federal Superfund laws do not necessarily bar state-law claims that would require companies to pay for clean-up beyond what EPA has already ordered, but landowners need to get EPA’s permission for additional clean-up, proves that “once again, Superfund is the gift to lawyers that keeps on giving. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:10 am by Michael Barber
Christian, considers whether federal law preempts state law claims for the cleanup of hazardous waste beyond what the EPA has ordered. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Dale Carpenter discusses the amicus brief he filed in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The Daily Beast, Geoffrey Stone criticizes Monday’s ruling in Town of Greece v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) That’s what seems to be the holding of Gilbert v. 7355 South Shore Condominium Ass’n & Shelley Norton (Chi. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:23 pm
Category: Civil Procedure    By: Christian Hannon, Contributor  TitleMemorylink v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
 The question is not whether some readers would have misunderstood the satire as stating facts but whether the average or reasonable reader would have come to that view. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
Florida and United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 5:55 am by Howard Friedman
State of Washington, (9th Cir.,, Oct. 15, 2018), the 9th Circuit held that the district court properly dismissed an inmate's 1st Amendment and RLUIPA claims regarding burning of his hair.In Ahdom v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Turning to the facts in the present case, Lord Reed stated that prisoners working in kitchens are integrated into the operation of the prison. [read post]