Search for: "Dept of Justice" Results 1301 - 1320 of 3,096
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2015, 6:49 am by Jim Sedor
Should the justices reject Arizona’s commission, at least one other, in California, is also likely to be in peril. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
Supreme Court in an argued case: Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court in Alabama Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:50 am
"On one hand, you don't want to Monday morning quarterback what's happened in the trial court, but on the other side you're making sure that justice was done," he said. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 9:54 pm by Patricia Salkin
This court disagreed, and found that vacatur of the Borst judgment in the interest of justice was warranted under the facts and circumstances. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 7:27 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:Remedial Costs for Unreasonable Settlements by InsurersChild abuser awarded £20,000 by Ireland court after being harassed, named and shamed on Facebook pageCocaine case raises questions about how well jurors understand their job | The Toronto StarOntario Court of Appeal clamps down on surveillance evidenceWhy the demise of Sun News Network may be a preview of things to comeCitronella bug spray makes comeback after public… [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Daniel Fisher recounts oral argument in the case of Texas Dept. of Housing vs. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:30 am by Wells Bennett
James Sensenbrenner, stated that Dept. of Justice’s interpretation of Sec. 215 was contrary to Congressional intent (though there is a dispute regarding whether Sensenbrenner was aware of DOJ’s interpretation prior to the Snowden disclosures). [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 9:45 am by EEM
Opportunity:Offshore Refugee and Humanitarian Visas: Creating a Simpler Framework (Australian Dept. of Immigration & Border Protection, Jan. 2015) [access]- Comments sought on a/m discussion paper; submit them by 16 February 2015.Resources:Abbott’s Gambit: The 2013 Australian Federal Election (ANU Press, 2015) [text]- See esp. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:07 am by Peter Mahler
Matter of Smith v Russo, 230 AD2d 863 [2d Dept 1996]; Matter of Chu v Sino Chemists, 192 AD2d 315 [1st Dept 1993]), and the nature and extent of any intervening changes to the business and/or its value certainly could be considered. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 12:19 pm
Why does today's opinion by the California Supreme Court, which overrules the Court's eight-year old Equal Protection decision in Hofsheier, remind me of the old Gilda Radner skit. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:39 am
In Only a Fool Has an Attorney for a Client Justice Beds shares his third law:Bedsworth's Third Law of Practice Dynamics: Represent robbers or murderers, bulls or bears, congressmen or kitten-drowners, but do not, under any circumstances, represent attorneys.And on the topic of articles by Justices, Presiding Justice Luis Gonzalez (NYAD 1st Dept.) has Celebrating the Legacy of the Magna Carta -- in today's New York Law Journal. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:42 am by Ben Cochran
We can help you fight for justice and pursue the maximum possible in compensation. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am by Epstein Becker Green
A final point of interest:  This was a 7-2 decision, with Justices Kennedy and Sotomayor dissenting. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am by Epstein Becker Green
A final point of interest:  This was a 7-2 decision, with Justices Kennedy and Sotomayor dissenting. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
As Justice Powell pointed out long ago, this test is limited only by the scope of a Justice’s imagination. [read post]