Search for: "Discovery Benefits, Inc." Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
Purpose of the Legislation The report of the Advisory Panel starts off on the right track with its recommendation that the legislation include a purpose clause for the benefit of judicial interpretation.[20] It recommends that the purpose of the legislation should be to “expand the democratic benefits of broad participation in public affairs and to reduce the risk that such participation will be unduly hampered by fear of legal action. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 10:32 am
will be presented by Chas Rampenthal, Vice President of Product Development and General Counsel, LegalZoom.com, Inc. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The bankruptcy court held that the discovery documents at issue could be disclosed to the public, because the public's interest in disclosure of these discovery documents outweighed the priests' privacy interest under Rule 26(c) and that the documents filed in court could be disclosed because they did not contain "scandalous" allegations for purposes of 11 U.S.C. 107(b). [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:41 pm by Lisa Solomon
McDermott Will & Emery, in which the plaintiff alleged that the defendant law firm’s failure to thoroughly review the work of contract attorneys at e-discovery vendor Stratify Inc. resulted in the production of 3,900 privileged documents in an underlying action. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:08 am by Mark S. Humphreys
" The trial court's order here not only prevents discovery that on its face goes to the heart of Graeber's UIM case, but awards sanctions for any attempt to develop a record supporting the need for such discovery. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:18 am
Shire pointed to paragraphs in the employment agreement that make all discoveries or inventions made by Mickle the property of the company; that prohibit Mickle from disclosing company confidential information for his own benefit; and that require that all patents and other intellectual property developed by Mickle be assigned to the company. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:49 pm
"We are very pleased to announce a transaction that allows us to realize the tremendous value we've built in ELS and use the proceeds to support our core businesses for the benefit of our clients. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
., Inc., 548 U.S. 124, 127 (2006) (Breyer, J., dissenting from dismissal of petition). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Domestic Relations Law § 240 (1-b) subdivisions (d) (g) and (i) and Family Court Act § 413 (1) subdivisions (d) (g) and (i) amended by Laws of 2011, Ch 436, effective November 15, 2011 In Rose v Moody, 83 NY2d 65 (1993) the Court of Appeals held Domestic Relations Law § 240 (1-b) and Family Court Act § 413 (1) unconstitutional insofar as they imposed an inflexible minimum child support obligation against support obligors whose income would, by virtue of the obligation, fall… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 1:13 pm
Moreover, the proposed amendment would have prejudiced the merging parties by requiring additional discovery on a broader market. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:19 am by Brenda Fulmer
Last month, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the much-anticipated Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]