Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 8,958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2021, 4:42 am
I have always been interested in the Motor Carrier Act (MCA) exemption of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 USC 213(b)(1), especially in the doctrine of “practical continuity” which is one of the ways that interstate commerce is determined and have defended a number of cases where we had to rely on practical continuity for the interstate commerce prong of this tri-partite element exemption. [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:26 pm
The physician was also required to complete 24 hours of CME (four hours in medical record-keeping and 20 hours in rheumatology). [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
App., Cuyahoga County May 1, 2008) "Defendant John F. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 11:45 am
” The judge initially struck from the TRO a requirement that defendant permit Equity to have a computer forensic expert examine his computer to ascertain: (1) whether defendant accessed Equity's confidential customer data and/or trade secrets; (2) whether the data has been forwarded to defendant’s new employer an Equity competitor; and (3) whether the data was purged or overwritten. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 7:42 am
Lying about a product’s country of origin can subject you to 20 years in Federal prison. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
Then you get $20. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 9:14 am
Harris, slip op. at 20. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am
Dirty World; Doe v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:35 pm
At multiple points, IBD is explicitly communicated to the prescribing physician as a potential risk of Accutane ingestion.Id. at 20. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 12:37 am
If the bill passes and is signed by the governor, it will take effect September 1, 2013. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
A postal inspector disguised as a carrier delivered the package, which someone in the house accepted and signed for on behalf of defendant (using a fictitious name). [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 5:24 pm
MICHAEL ASBURY, DOES 1-20, INCL. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:29 am
Plaintiff does not allege that Defendants made any misrepresentation or omission of material fact to support a claim for fraud or that Defendants' breached any other duty independent of their contractual obligations. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Sept. 20, 2010). [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 9:45 am
First Data Corp., 20 Cal. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm
The defendant argued that Order 8 rule 1(3) required that the agreement name not only a method of service but also specify a location out of Singapore where service could take place. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
Atkinson 20. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
Atkinson 20. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
Because the new statute does not include the procedural protections present in the federal pretrial detention statute upheld in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
§ 13-20-801, et seq. [read post]
