Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 5,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2009, 5:57 pm
Marijuana does not belong in Schedule I. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:55 pm
Should you mess up when filing yourself (or your less than experienced attorney does) this could set you back many months in a already long process. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm
1. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
In the two related cases, J 38/92 and J 39/92, the Legal Board made the general statement that a stay of the grant proceedings has the effect that during the suspension neither the EPO nor the parties can validly perform any legal acts. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
Britain second with 31.8:1; Italy third with 25.9:1, New Zealand fourth with 24.9:1. [read post]
16 May 2019, 5:00 am
The results show that the public does not consider this a closed case. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
P. 1. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:45 pm
at 39:16& [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 10:33 pm
No. 1528 (S.C.), where the court held at para. 17 that lack of timeliness does not necessarily preclude an application to strike a jury notice. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
At this juncture the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n°1 de Alicante y n°1 de Marca Comunitaria decided to stay the proceedings and referred the following questions for a preliminary ruling: ‘1. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 4:02 pm
The Committee's request for comment raises two issues that fall within my area of expertise. 1. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:58 am
Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638–39 (Tex. 1999). [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 9:07 am
City of Whittier (1972) 8 Cal.3d 39.) [read post]
9 May 2010, 2:52 pm
The Sixth Amendment right of the “accused” to assistance of counsel in “all criminal prosecutions” is limited by its terms: “it does not attach until a prosecution is commenced. [read post]
27 May 2007, 9:50 am
'' . . . [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:04 am
R.S. 39:1538 does not mention dismissal as a penalty, one could have read the statute as supplemental to the prohibitions in La. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
The Colorado Supreme Court later held that Colorado Revised Statutes section 1-1-113(1) affords such voters the right to bring such a suit.[1] (Colorado’s constitution doesn’t impose any “standing” limitations, such as those the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:23 pm
This means that the exchange rate does not affect prices directly. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 4:16 pm
All of that being said, I will try to respond to your individual questions: 1. [read post]
