Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 1301 - 1320 of 4,487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
AC case on May 31, 2021 as her last case before her retirement from the SCC on July 1, 2021. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:01 am
Given that the Cubs net RCAA/RSAA total is 113 (43 RCAA/70 RSAA) and the Stros is -42 (-41 RCAA/-1 RSAA), it's surprising that the Stros aren't even further behind. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
Only claims 1 to 15 were searched. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
 The Report does not specify at which level such mediation should take place. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  §43(a)(1)(A) provides a very solid ROP claim when there’s falsity about endorsement, participation, etc.; that will work under the 1A b/c that’s false speech for commercial purposes designed to influence purchasing decision. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 7:27 pm by Jon McLaughlin
Marotta, a 43-year-old mechanic, was dragged into the dispute when the couple filed for state assistance. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Moreover, she could not reframe a mere authorship claim as a §43(a)(1)(B) claim, because authorship isn’t a covered “nature, characteristic, or quality” under those sections. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 2:52 am
The fact that LAKOTA refers to the language spoken by the subgroup of the Sioux tribe known as the Lakota does not mean that the term cannot also approximate the identity of a people or institution. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dastardoesn’t clearly bar false advertising §43(a)(1)(B) claims in general, but it does bar the claim as pled here: “a copyright claim repackaged under a trademark statute. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 8:15 am by Larry
This is number 20 in my 2016 rulings of the week series, not number 43 as it should be. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
Does trade-mark likelihood of confusion actually exist? [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“Thus, identifying Marley or whoever holds the rights to his persona in the alternative does not render the survey data useless or irrelevant. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 9:29 pm
However, exactly the same formulation appears at s.5(1) - employment; and s20(1) - Goods and services. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 9:29 pm
However, exactly the same formulation appears at s.5(1) - employment; and s20(1) - Goods and services. [read post]