Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:11 am
English v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
TREATY ON EXTRADITION AND MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY AMERIKA BIRLESIK DEVLETLERI ILE TURKIYE CUMHURIYETI ARASINDA SUCLULARIN GERI VERILMESI CEZA ISLERINDE KARSILIKLI YARDIM ANLASMASI BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION CONSIDERING THAT: The Treaty on Extradition and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the United States of America and the Republic of Turkey,… [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
For this last week, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:00 am
This piece is in response to Rosalind English’s post on this blog arguing that in M.S. v United Kingdom the European Court extended to far the ambit of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which protects against torture, and inhuman or degrading treatment. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:20 am
On Thursday, 18 March 2010, the weblog of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice published a piece of news under the title “Exclusive jurisdiction clauses and antisuit injunctions”, on a new English case on anti-suit injunctions under the Brussels Regulation (the “other” State being a third State). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:07 am
It has also been noted that, just as the English frequently fail at penalties, the Germans excel in them. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
Novelty of claim 1 was attacked based upon United States Patent No. 5,058,198 to Rocci. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
See paras 23 – 29 of R (English UK Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1726 for a further explanation of the workings of PBS. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:27 am
Whilst the English court should apply a strong presumption that the procedures of other Convention States complied with Article 6, it was not wrong for an English court to consider whether a judgment of a court of a Convention State contravened the Convention. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:24 am
It is an ordinary English word and should be construed as such. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:24 am
It is an ordinary English word and should be construed as such. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm
However the English decisions of Bunt v Tilley ([2007] 1 WLR 1243) and Metropolitan International had expressed a contrary view. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:06 am
” Tsai-Yi v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Leggat v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
Judgment Warby J considered that Mr Mitchell was domiciled or at least present in England and Wales, and therefore that the English Court had jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 2:23 am
it cannot make sense for the courts of another member state to give effect to a “reorganisation measure” but not to other provisions of the law of the home state affecting its operation. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
The Court stated that although the Promise Doctrine is viewed as uniquely Canadian, it has its roots in English law in Hatmaker v Joseph ((1919) 36 PRC 231) and Re Alsop's Patent ((1907) 24 RPC 733 - "false suggestion or representation") where, the now extinct doctrine the Court referred to as the "False Promise Doctrine" derived. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
The Court stated that although the Promise Doctrine is viewed as uniquely Canadian, it has its roots in English law in Hatmaker v Joseph ((1919) 36 PRC 231) and Re Alsop's Patent ((1907) 24 RPC 733 - "false suggestion or representation") where, the now extinct doctrine the Court referred to as the "False Promise Doctrine" derived. [read post]
