Search for: "Fish v. United States" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2012, 12:58 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:25 am by Audrey Huang
  The United States District Court for the District of Montana struck down the 2009 Rule as violating the ESA because the ESA does not permit partial delisting of a distinct population segment. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:27 am by Steve Davies
United States, 384 F.3d 721, 728 (9th Cir. 2004) (“[T]he APA does not empower the district court to . . . order the agency to reach a particular result. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by Will Bland
Recently this doctrine became the focus of attention in an interesting case from the United States District Court in Hawaii. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am by Steve Davies
ANALYSIS The cornerstones of plaintiffs’ separation of powers challenge were laid in the mid-19th century when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 9:40 am by Robert Horton
  According to the United States Geological Survey, more than 95 percent of those Delta wetlands have been destroyed and new development threatens the remaining tidal wetlands. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 1:55 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:36 am by Conor McEvily
Joe Palazzolo of the Wall Street Journal Law Blog reports that Antoine Jones, the respondent in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:20 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:07 am by NBlack
In his Order, after reviewing a number of relevant New York Appellate Division cases, United States Magistrate Judge William D. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Benjamin Wittes
 European states can readily regulate the content of speech, while the US Supreme Court, in Holder v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Benjamin Wittes
European states can readily regulate the content of speech, while the US Supreme Court, in Holder v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:44 am by Michael F. Smith
  “Under the majority’s test,” Justice Sotomayor wrote, “four wrongs apparently make a right.” Conclusion In largely sidestepping the second, broader question on which certiorari was granted – whether Malley and its exclusionary-rule corollary, United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by National Indian Law Library
United States Federal Highway Administration (sacred sites)Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 9:01 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Carved African ivory seized by US Fish and Wildlife in the case against Victor Gordon..Source: USFWSPlea negotiations continue in the case of United States v. [read post]