Search for: "GONZALES v STATE" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
See 18 U.S.C. 1505 ("Whoever corruptly . . . influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, . . . [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:43 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
When states ban gender-affirming care (GAC) for minors, for instance, they cite Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Since the mid-1970s, he has been deeply pessimistic about the possibilities of political change: Political action of any sort, he believes, cannot improve or ameliorate the condition of black people in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm by FDABlog HPM
Supreme Court has thwarted a prior Government attempt to define the practice of medicine in Gonzales v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 12:53 am
The settlement in Bradburn Parent/Teacher Store Inc. v. 3M -- a class action brought by direct purchasers and retailers -- came on the heels of a trio of settlements reached last year. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Hobby Lobby Tenth Circuit decision called on Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm by Donna Coker
 Since 1994, VAWA has broken new ground in federal and state responses to domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:34 am by Bridget Crawford
 Since 1994, VAWA has broken new ground in federal and state responses to domestic violence, sexual as [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
De LaRosa's semantic alchemy defies the criteria for gang activity as defined inthe CDCR rules and regulations, as well as the standard set forth in the1994 case Castillo v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Prohibitions against later-term abortions (and arguably, those against so-called “partial-birth” abortions, upheld by the Supreme Court in Gonzales v. [read post]