Search for: "Gay v. State"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 3,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2014, 9:05 am
(In addition to opposing such forms of church-state entanglement as officially sponsored prayer, he supports the right of gays to marry.) [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 12:35 pm
App. filed Aug. 22, 2017); Cooper Gay Martinez Del Rio y Asociados Intermediarios de Reaseguro S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 12:35 pm
App. filed Aug. 22, 2017); Cooper Gay Martinez Del Rio y Asociados Intermediarios de Reaseguro S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
In Gay v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
(Adar v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:24 am
Second, the Court’s ruling treated Obergefell v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am
Katz, The Role of Public Reason in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Mark Creech of the Christian Action League called the lawsuit "an effort by gay activism to run people of faith completely out of the public sector. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:24 pm
Today's Recorder offers a short interview with 1/2's new Justice Therese Stewart here, the "first openly gay woman to serve as an appellate justice in California. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 11:20 am
The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently released its long-awaited draft enforcement guidance on harassment in the workplace. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:38 am
In UNITE HERE Local 355 v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Yesterday in Miller v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 10:10 am
Perhaps most importantly, Windsor presents a powerful – and personal – story of DOMA’s discriminatory effects on lesbian and gay married couples. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:18 pm
My initial reaction to the Ninth Circuit panel's decision today in Perry v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 5:50 am
Therefore, under Simonton, gay and lesbian employees had no recourse under Title VII. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 7:45 am
" If the state made Smith create a website for a gay marriage—just because she was willing to create one for a straight marriage—that would be compelled speech, which would violate her First Amendment rights. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm
But even if it did not, the judge added, a state ban on gay marriages satisfies the minimum level of constitutional analysis. [read post]
