Search for: "German v. State"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 3,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2013, 7:14 am
Remarkably, this coincided with another unlikely event -- the 40th anniversary of the not-overruled-yet Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 4:15 am
(a Taiwan Corp.) and HTC America (its US subsidiary based in Washington State) are accused of infringement. [read post]
22 May 2013, 2:18 pm
The Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision soon in Fisher v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:30 pm
The National Security Archive et. al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 8:46 am
United States, 568 U.S. 23 (2012). [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 7:14 am
For example, in support of his conclusion in Kiobel v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
On Februrary 3, Adidas, following-through on its promise to take appropriate action barring a satisfactory response, filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Riedell, here, in Portland federal district court ("home court" for German-based Adidas in the United States). [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
The case is C-524/04 Test Claimants in the Thin Cap Group Litigation v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
Waterkotte: Provisional injunctions under unfair competition law The Higher Regional Court of Hamburg addressed the delimitation between Art. 7(1) and (2) of the Brussels Ibis Regulation after Wikingerhof v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 8:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:42 pm
So, a contract which selects German law, but is litigated in an OK court (like Campbell v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
: The need to encourage legal entrepreneurship (Spicy IP) State’s copyright not exempt under RTI Act: Delhi Metro Rail Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:13 am
Also, see Appeal Court of Düsseldorf stating that the different treatment of SEP licensees is accepted if it can be justified as a result of normal market behaviour, and that licensing conditions can be abusive, only if they are significantly different between licensees; see Sisvel v Haier, Appeal Court of Düsseldorf, 30 March 2017 - Case No. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
| L'Oreal v RN Ventures - The Registered Design Perspective | More than Just a Game: Music, video games, GDPR & technical protective measures” (Report 2 and Report 3) | German FCJ: doctors can have their profile deleted from rating site - but can they? [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Furthermore, the applicant had failed to include this claim in his application: the Court clarified that failure to state a claim in the application cannot be compensated by introducing the claim at the hearing (unless the plea is based on matters of law or of fact which come to light in the course of the procedure), as stated by Article 48(2) of the Rules of procedure of the General Court and held in previous case law (Case T‑246/06, Redcats SA v OHIM). [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 9:26 am
I've gone back and reviewed the beginning of the tape and, sure enough, Judge Pooler states that Judge Sach (sp?) [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:30 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:06 pm
Hot off the press and only available at TalkLeft: Peniel Cronin's revised Caucus v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:50 am
” case in Lisy Corp v. [read post]
