Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 67,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2024, 11:56 am
Given that it's an entirely for-profit company, I think you'd be surprised to learn that X (formerly Twitter) actually engages in speech that's allegedly noncommercial. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 3:12 pm
As a result, given the state of the evidence below, the anti-SLAPP motion should have been denied in part.But once we hit summary judgment time (and surely by trial, if it ever gets there), Patton Boggs is looking pretty darn good. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 3:35 pm
The person who groomed 'em gets 45 years to life; I very strongly suspect he'll die in prison (and, given the typical treatment of these offenders in prison, that his experience there will not be pleasant in the slightest). [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
Given that the opinion involves smuggling things (here, cell phones and tobacco) into prison, it reminded me of The Shawshank Redemption. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:39 pm
Given those facts, you'd facially think it makes total sense to put him in adult court.But read Justice O'Leary's opinion. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:57 pm
I'm glad that Wife is now out of that (acutely) horrible situation.Just one minor error: Given the context, at the top of page 3, in the sentences that say "At a March 15, 2023 hearing, Husband was represented by counsel. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:04 pm
 A recent case (McEvoy v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:31 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff & Respondent, v. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 1:01 pm
Tom Merrill (Columbia) Guest-Blogging on <i>West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:13 pm
Keller et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:14 am
Qamrul (Cam) Rahman v Sultana 2011 NY Slip Op 04029 Decided on May 10, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department held that the lower court properly ordered maintenance of only $1,000 per month and ordered wife to apply for social security. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 3:50 pm
In Stowar v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:50 am
New York’s Appellate Division, First Department, in 135 East 57th Street LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:07 am
HH. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:39 am
Defendant was stopped for a suspected DUI and he was given a portable breath test. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 3:32 am
In Capitol v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 5:37 am
Accountants (in general) may rely upon information given to them by the client and are not under a general requirement to investigate. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
Amendments should be freely given, yet in Daniel R. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
Arch Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:01 pm
" Spine Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
