Search for: "Gray v. HAS"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 1,984
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 1:06 am
This follows earlier decisions reaching the same conclusion, although not necessarily for identical reasoning, in Bridle v Ikhlas (22nd February 2011, Oxford County Court) and Gray v Toner (11 November 2010, Liverpool County Court). [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:23 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision in Lesher v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:30 am
Sir David James Tyson Kitchin (56), who was called to the Bar (Gray’s Inn) in 1977 and has been a Bencher since 2003. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:09 am
You can download a full copy of PAS, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:37 pm
FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:06 am
In today’s case (Iwanik v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:48 pm
In the landmark case of Miranda v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:06 am
The decision has a skeptical account of logic behind the standing doctrine. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 5:51 am
The problem is not black-and-white, but involves shades of gray. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:24 am
Thompson and Cullen v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 6:46 am
Press 1 for real fakes, 2 for replicas, 3 for unauthorised gray goods ... [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:53 pm
In today’s case (AB v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
First Quality Baby Products (Gray on Claims) (IP Osgoode) CAFC: Pet-door patent dispute over jurisdiction clarified: Radio Systems Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:25 am
Weiner v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:51 am
Rogers v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:39 pm
As demonstrated in a recent case from the Southern District of New York, Zip International Group, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
The Court of Appeal found that two of the eleven statements found to be contempuous by the judged were not, in fact, contemptuous (see Shadrake Alan v Attorney-General [2011] SGCA 26) Events and Broadcasts At 4.00pm on Tuesday 7 June 2011, BBC Radio 4′s “Law in Action” has a programme on “Super-Injunctions”, featuring interviews with Sir Charles Gray, Mark Warby QC and Hugh Tomlinson QC. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am
And the Court explained why preservation requirements apply to the prosecutor:Given that the primary reason for "demanding notice through objection or motion in a trial court, as with any specific objection, is to bring the claim to the trial court's attention" (People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 20-21 [1995]), the People are required to alert the suppression court if they believe that the defendant has failed to meet his burden to establish standing (see People… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
As we mentioned earlier in the week, Rhode Island has now fallen. [read post]
