Search for: "Holder v. State" Results 1301 - 1320 of 7,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2024, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
” Either way, these allegations implicate the exclusive rights to copyright holders bestowed by federal statute. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am by Cormac Early
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 12:11 pm by Annemarie Bridy
The Register closed her lecture by stating that a revised Copyright Act “[m]ost importantly…would serve the public interest. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:22 am
He was satisfied that there was a threat of a future infringement because AMO’s page on the Alibaba website stated that it would be attending the Vape Expo in Birmingham and was planning to exhibit the AMO holder there.Nugee J was further satisfied that damages would not provide adequate relief for PMI. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District, Houston Division, issued an opinion on January 24, 2012, in a case styled, Bender Square Partners v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am by Bernard Bell
  Permit holders were responsible for purchasing the devices. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 2:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
 Article 3 requires that EU Member States protect the exclusive rights given to copyright holders through national legislation, specifically in relation to communication to the public via wired or wireless means (i.e. the Internet). [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 2:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
 Article 3 requires that EU Member States protect the exclusive rights given to copyright holders through national legislation, specifically in relation to communication to the public via wired or wireless means (i.e. the Internet). [read post]