Search for: "Hughes, Appeal of" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2014, 2:09 pm by Gene Quinn
In an opinion authored by Judge Reyna (with Judges Wallach and Hughes joining), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding inequitable conduct, and on that basis alone, affirmed the district court’s judgment. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  The court of appeals concluded that applying this law in Mississippi would have the effect of closing the state’s one existing abortion clinic and would therefore impose an undue burden on women seeking to exercise their constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 5:37 am by David Cheifetz
Hughes, 1980 CanLII 23 (SCC), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 880, 114 D.L.R. (3d) 1, 14 C.C.L.T. 1. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 6:46 pm
Later, on appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, the patentee repeated the same argument, this time including quotation marks around the phrase “selectively rotated. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:54 am by Gene Quinn
” ScriptPro appealed and the Federal Circuit, per Judge Taranto (with Judges Bryson and Hughes) reversed, finding summary judgement inappropriate. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 8:15 am by Gene Quinn
The Federal Circuit, per Judge Newman and with Chief Judge Prost and Judge Hughes, found that the Federal Circuit lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal from a decision to remand the case back to State court, citing 28 U.S.C. 1447(d), which makes unreviewable "[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed…" Section 1447(d) seems, and the outcome likely unfair, although no one will likely shed a tear for MPHJ. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 8:15 am by Gene Quinn
The Federal Circuit, per Judge Newman and with Chief Judge Prost and Judge Hughes, found that the Federal Circuit lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal from a decision to remand the case back to State court, citing 28 U.S.C. 1447(d), which makes unreviewable "[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed…" Section 1447(d) seems, and the outcome likely unfair, although no one will likely shed a tear for MPHJ. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 9:55 am by Dennis Crouch
On appeal, the Federal Circuit has reversed – finding that summary judgment was improper. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 11:08 am
  We’ll give the opinion some credit for a fairly thorough discussion of the relevant case law going both ways on preemption and TwIqbal – but it loses most of its appeal by landing at the wrong end of the spectrum. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:50 am by Catherine Rose
  Supreme Court judgment In a judgment delivered by Lord Hughes, the Supreme Court unanimously refused Mr Nunn’s appeal. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:29 pm by Howard Knopf
He can also be sighted and heard from quite regularly at Hugh Hansen’s annual Fordham IP Conference in New York, which is always held on the first Thursday and Friday after Easter™. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 4:23 pm by Giles Peaker
Oh and Simon Hughes MP told the BBC he was against the bedroom tax all along. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:19 pm
Hugh Hansen’s lecture on Copyright and Public Domain, former guest kat Alberto adopts a Liebniz-wise approach to portray current relations between copyright holders and the rest of the world [copyright not-holder and copyright haters]. [read post]