Search for: "I v. B"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 24,517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
The first decision I’ve seen on this issue is Henry v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 11:37 am
Cooper B-Line. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 10:15 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 8:20 am
Without such an arrangement, Viral DRM doesn’t have legal standing to enforce the copyrights per 17 USC 501(b). [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 8:35 pm
"And then here's the sentence (and explanation therefor) the trial court ultimately pronounced: "[B]ased on the case I came up with the same calculations for count 1, exact same. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
Juror John V. himself was convicted of DUI by plea. . . . [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm
Three weeks ago, CAAF granted review in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:05 pm
What confounds me, however, is Part III-B of Justice Barrett's Vidal concurrence. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:31 pm
I'm impressed. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 11:49 am
As I explained here, this distinction is irrelevant. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 8:27 am
The post-Lemmon v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:57 am
For example, I previously represented Google in Virentem Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 9:01 am
Compare the analogous decade-long battle in Enigma v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:26 am
In FTC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
In a prior post, I have analyzed the justices’ treatment of the questions presented in the petition in Smith v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:09 am
Case citation: Lukis v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:54 am
But I digress. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:54 am
But I digress. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:21 am
Bryant v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
